For a successful charge of vandalism, which of the following states of mind is NOT considered?

To determine the appropriate state of mind for a charge of vandalism, it's important to understand the legal principles surrounding the act. States of mind such as willful, malicious, and wanton all indicate a conscious decision to cause damage or destruction to another's property. These terms relate to intentions that go beyond mere negligence and demonstrate a clear disregard for the property of others, reflecting an understanding of the nature of the act committed.

In contrast, the term "intentional" while often used in legal contexts, does not carry the same specific connotations in the laws pertaining to vandalism as the other terms listed. For instance, being "intentional" might imply awareness of actions, yet it lacks the additional nuances of malice or willfulness, which are crucial for establishing the culpability required for vandalism charges. Therefore, “intentional” does not encapsulate the malice or willfulness required to affirmatively prove a case of vandalism, making it the state of mind that is often not considered in evaluating such charges.