In the context of trespassing, does the person in control of the property need to be present to forbid entry?

The correct understanding is that a person in control of a property does not need to be physically present to forbid entry. They can convey their intent regarding who is allowed on the property through various means, whether it's through prior communication, posted signs, fencing, or other indicators that establish boundaries and access rights. This principle acknowledges that property rights exist regardless of the owner's physical presence, allowing them to control access even when they are absent.

Other responses may imply conditions or limitations that are not necessary for establishing the prohibition of entry. For instance, claiming that the owner's presence is required to enforce boundaries undermines their legal rights as the property controller. Additionally, suggesting that these rules only apply under certain conditions, such as the type of property or the display of signs, narrows the overarching property rights established by law. Thus, the fundamental principle remains: an individual can designate access to their property at any time, irrespective of their physical presence.