What defenses can be utilized against breaking and entering charges?

The option that includes lawful entry, lack of intent, and mistaken identity outlines valid defenses against breaking and entering charges.

Lawful entry can serve as a strong defense if the individual had the permission to enter the property or if they were in a public space, thus negating the unlawful aspect of the charge. Lack of intent is another critical factor; in breaking and entering cases, proving that there was no intent to commit a crime upon entering can absolve an individual of guilt. Mistaken identity can also be a compelling defense if the accused can demonstrate that they were not the person who committed the act, emphasizing the importance of accurately identifying the perpetrator.

These defenses highlight the nuances of intent and permission in determining culpability for breaking and entering, focusing not only on the act of entry but also on the mental state and circumstances of the individual involved.