Which type of evidence is most commonly used to establish breaking and entering?

Physical evidence such as broken locks, footprints, or fingerprints is the most commonly used type of evidence to establish breaking and entering because it provides direct, tangible proof of unauthorized entry into a structure. Physical evidence often includes items left at the scene that can link a suspect to the crime, such as fingerprints found on the entry point or footprints leading away from the location. This type of evidence can be critical in court, as it can physically demonstrate that a break-in occurred and can also help identify the individual responsible.

Other types of evidence, while potentially useful, typically do not offer the same level of direct proof regarding the act of breaking and entering. Digital evidence, for instance, may provide context or communication related to the crime but does not directly show the act itself. Witness testimony can support the case, but it may be less reliable due to the subjective nature of human recall. Video surveillance may capture the act; however, it might not always be available or clear enough to be conclusive. In contrast, physical evidence is often more definitive and can significantly bolster a charge of breaking and entering.