Which type of evidence is commonly utilized in breaking and entering cases?

The choice that identifies surveillance footage, physical evidence, and witness statements as commonly utilized evidence in breaking and entering cases is accurate because these types of evidence collectively provide comprehensive information that can establish the circumstances of the crime.

Surveillance footage can capture the actions of suspects in real-time, offering visual proof of when the breaking and entering occurred, the methods used, and the individuals involved. Physical evidence, such as fingerprints, DNA, or tools left at the scene, can directly link a suspect to the incident or indicate unauthorized access. Witness statements can provide first-hand accounts that corroborate the details of the crime, such as the presence of unfamiliar individuals in the area or sounds during the incident, reinforcing the timeline and context.

Together, these forms of evidence create a robust case and help law enforcement build a clearer understanding of the events surrounding a breaking and entering incident, making them far more reliable than just verbal accounts or solely relying on law enforcement testimony.